The Land Trust has cautiously welcomed the recent Government's announcement to speed up appropriate development, but is concerned that by relaxing the planning process on brownfield land, it removes the crucial decision making process to ensure that the use of land is appropriately balanced.

Brownfield sites, particularly in urban areas can have substantial value by serving a variety of different purposes for society other than development:

* To create great, healthy new developments
* To support climate change mitigation and adaptation measures, for flood prevention, heat island regulators etc.
* To provide existing communities in densely urban areas with access to green open space.

Euan Hall, CEO of the Land Trust said: “It is true that brownfield sites are valuable sources of land for development. However, they are also extremely valuable when transformed into sustainable green open spaces. Therefore, there is a need to balance the use of brownfield for development and for green space to create places for people to live, work and play. But by relaxing the planning process, who will champion the green spaces and decide the most appropriate use for the land?”

Research has proven the benefits of green space on both mental and physical health. It also encourages social cohesion, provides space for educational opportunities and are free local amenities for families). As a result, this can have significant benefits to the UK economy. Without a system in place, these important elements could be overlooked.

This view is echoed by Noel Farrer, President of the Landscape Institute, who said: “Development on brownfield sites is a good idea, but it needs green infrastructure (GI) at its heart if it is to deliver the housing we need and places where people want to live long term. Given the acute shortage of housing, quick-fix, poor quality housing would sell, but it is dangerously short-sighted as we will all be paying a high price for it in the future through the creation of failed communities.”

Hall added: “I find it is disappointing that the decision is not tacking the actual issue, which is to have a joined up approach to land use across the country. Relaxing the planning process is a short term win, and will have long term detrimental impacts on society.”

The Land Trust has demonstrated that where brownfield, which is not suitable for development, can have greater value as green open space. Its former oil refinery; Canvey Wick in Essex has been hailed as a “brownfield rainforest” and its disused power station; Oliver Road Lagoons in Thurrock, is a wildlife haven, with wildflower-rich habitats, supporting over 1,300 species, 50 of which are classified as endangered. Both of these sites have SSSI status (Site of Special Scientific Interest) and are nationally recognised for their ecological importance, supporting key ecosystem services, and in turn, supporting our economy.

If there is no organisation to administer the correct use of land, then the balance between the built environment and green spaces could be lost, which would be detrimental to society.

Taking on board the benefits that different uses of brownfield land can have to society, the planning process is important for ensuring that conditions are put in place and land is used appropriately, to carefully create places where people want to live, work and play, whilst supporting the environment and important ecosystems.

Hall concluded: “Therefore, there needs to be a joined up approach to land use in the UK with a process to identify the suitability of the land, whether this is for development, for public open space or both.”